383 ITR 25 HC (Bom) (vii) Andhra Networks Ltd. v. DCIT

250 ITR 542High Court2001#11401 most cited
9

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2024.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 383 ITR 25 HC (Bom) (vii) Andhra Networks Ltd. v. DCIT

GOLDGREEN LAND HOLDINGS LLP( FORMERLY GOLD GREEN HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED),SHANKARPALLY MANDAL, MIRZAGUDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - WARD 2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 473/HYD/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Mar 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 473/Hyd/2023 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Goldgreen Land Holdings Llp Vs. Income Tax Officer, (Formerly Gold Green Holdings Ward-2(1), Private Limited), Hyderabad Shankarpally Mandal, Mirzaguda [Pan No. Aadcg2864N] अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent धििााररती द्वारा / Assessee By: Shri Kumar Pal Tated, Ar राजस्‍व द्वारा / Revenue By: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, Dr सुिवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 06/03/2024 घोर्णा की तारीख/Pronouncement On: 22/03/2024 आदेश / Order Per K. Narasimha Chary, J.M: Aggrieved By The Order Dated 07/08/2023 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi (“Ld. Cit(A)”), In The Case Of Goldgreen Land Holdings Private Limited (“The Assessee”) For The Assessment Year 2017-18, Assessee Preferred This Appeal.

For Appellant: Shri Kumar Pal Tated, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(14)Section 48Section 50C

…erty Act. Transfer as defined in the Act is to be given a simple meaning. Therefore, transfer of immovable property of the value exceeding Rs.100/- can be said to have been effected on the date of execution of the document- CIT V.Mormasji MancharjiVaid (2001) 250 ITR 542 (Guj.).(FB). 3. In view of the mandatory provisions and also judicial precedents, a few of which are recorded above for ready reference, it may kindly be noticed that the ‘transfer’ of the land properties under review, Page 8 of 12 was deemed to have been concluded in favour of the assessee- company by virtue of the aforesaid two Agreements of s…

SHRI DASHRATH AMBALAL PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -7(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 296/AHD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Jan 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 296/Ahd/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08) Dashrath Ambalal Patel, Ito, बनाम/ 9, Jashwant Society, Ward – 7(2), Vs. Jodhpur Char Rasta, Satellite, Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad – 380 015. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Akypp 5852 G .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri S. N. Divatia & Mehul Talera, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri N. J. Vyas, Sr. D.R.

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Divatia & Mehul Talera, A.RFor Respondent: Shri N. J. Vyas, Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 250Section 54Section 54F

…e of Harsutrai J. Raval Vs. CIT (2002) 255 ITR 315 held that if the conditions u/s 54F of the Act are substantially satisfied then assessee is entitled for deduction. Hon'ble Gujarat high court full such in the case of CIT Vs. Mormasji Manchariji Vaid (2001) 250 ITR 542 categorically held that it is the date of execution of immovable property rather than date of registration which is all important The appellant's case is squarely covered with Hon'ble Delhi high court decision in the case of Balraj Vs. CIT (2002) 254 ITR 22. It was held by Hon'ble high court that- "For the purpose of attracting the provisions o…

383 ITR 25 HC (Bom) (vii) Andhra Networks Ltd. v. DCIT (250 ITR 542) — Cited in 9 Judgments | BharatTax