PCIT v. Jakharia Fabric (P.) Ltd.

118 Taxmann.com 406High Court2020#2898 most cited

What is PCIT v. Jakharia Fabric (P.) Ltd. authority for?

When purchases are not doubted by the Assessing Officer, only the profit element embedded in the purchases, not the entire amount, is taxable if the purchases are found to be bogus.

41

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Jakharia Fabric (P.) Ltd. · bogus purchases · profit element · entire amount disallowed · Section 143(3) · Section 133(6) · Section 132 · Section 44AD

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Jakharia Fabric (P.) Ltd.

INCOME TAX OFFICER 41(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. ANIL TRANSPORT SERVICE, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue bearing ITA No

ITA 5435/MUM/2025[2009]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Apr 2026

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Ito 41(1)(1), Mumbai Vs Anil Transport Service Room No.830, Kautilya B-102, Harshad Apartment, E.E. Bhavan, Bkc, Bandra East Highway Behind Everad Nagar Sion Mumbai-400051 East, Mumbai-400022 Pan: Aalfa8944J Appellant Respondent Co No.90/Mum/2026 (Assessment Year: 2009-10) Anil Transport Service Vs Ito 41(1)(1) B-102, Harshad Apartment, Room No.830, Kautilya Bhavan, E.E. Highway Behind Everad Bkc, Bandra East Mumbai-400051 Nagar Sion East, Mumbai- 400022 Pan: Aalfa8944J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri C.V.Dharkar Revenue By : Shri Surendra Mohan (Sr. Dr) Date Of Hearing : 01/04/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 07/04/2026

For Appellant: Shri C.V.DharkarFor Respondent: Shri Surendra Mohan (Sr. DR)
Section 131Section 143(3)Section 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER BEFORE SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND ITO 41(1)(1), Mumbai vs Anil Transport Service Room No.830, Kautilya B-102, Harshad Apartment, E.E. Bhavan, BKC, Bandra East Highway Behind Everad Nagar Sion Mumbai-400051 East, Mumbai-400022 PAN: AALFA8944J APPELLANT RESPONDENT CO No.90/Mum/2026 (Assessment Year: 2009-10) Anil Transport Service vs ITO 41(1)(1) B-102, Harshad Apartment, Room No.830, Kautilya Bhavan, E.E. Highway Behind Everad BKC, Bandra East Mumbai-400051 Nagar Sion East, Mumbai- 400022 PAN: AALF…

IPCA LABORATORIES LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee as well as the revenue for AYs 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2014-15 are partly allowed

ITA 881/MUM/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 880/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 879/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 882/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 881/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 883/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agrawal (Adv)For Respondent: Shri K. C Selvamani (DR)
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 35Section 80I

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, AM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 880/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 879/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 882/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 881/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 883/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) IPCA Laboratories Ltd बिधम/ DCIT, Central Circle-5(2) 19th Floor, Air India 48 Kandivli I…

Showing 120 of 41 · Page 1 of 3

PCIT v. Jakharia Fabric (P.) Ltd. (118 Taxmann.com 406) — Cited in 41 Judgments | BharatTax