294 ITR 444 (Delhi) 4. CIT v. Deepak Aggarwal

308 ITR 116High Court2009#4842 most cited

What is 294 ITR 444 (Delhi) 4. CIT v. Deepak Aggarwal authority for?

A search is an invasion of privacy that should normally be continuous, with any hiatus requiring a plausible explanation. This principle is established by multiple High Court decisions.

24

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Deepak Aggarwal · 308 ITR 116 · search and seizure · invasion of privacy · continuous search · hiatus in search · plausible reason · section 132 · section 143(3) · section 147 · section 148

Judgments citing 294 ITR 444 (Delhi) 4. CIT v. Deepak Aggarwal

294 ITR 444 (Delhi) 4. CIT v. Deepak Aggarwal (308 ITR 116) — Cited in 24 Judgments | BharatTax