21 (Kar.) (e) CIT v. Lakshmi Trust Co.

167 Taxmann 27High Court2008#13607 most cited
7

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2024.

Sections most often in play

Judgments citing 21 (Kar.) (e) CIT v. Lakshmi Trust Co.

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. BAPU REDDY JALA , NIZAMABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 606/HYD/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Acit, Central Circle 2(4) Vs. Shri Bapu Reddy Jala Hyderabad Nizamabad Pan:Aabci9355A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, Ca Revenue By: Shri Kumar Aditya, Dr Date Of Hearing: 12/06/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 15/06/2023 Order Per Laliet Kumar, J.M This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 26.08.2022 Of The Learned Cit (A)-12, Hyderabad Relating To A.Y. 2019-20. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: "1. The Ld. Cit(Appeals) Erred Both In Law & On Facts Of The Case In Granting Relief To The Assessee. 2. The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Law By Allowing The Assessee'S Appeal The Assessment Order Passed U/S. 153A Of The It Act, 1961 Dated 29.09.2021 Stating That The Sum Of Rs.75,00,000/- Not To Be Treated As Unexplained Income Of The Assessee. 3. The Ld. Cita) Erred In Law By Allowing The Assessee'S Appeal The Assessment Order Passed U/S. 271D Of The It Act, 1961 Dated 01.06.2021

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 153ASection 269Section 269SSection 271DSection 69A

…rumal (2015) 53 Taxmann.com 17 f) Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs. Smt. Dimpal Yadav (2015) 61 taxmann.com 219 Page 7 of 15 ITA No.606 of 2022 Bapu Reddy Jala g) Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. M/s. Balaji Traders (2008) 167 Taxmann 27 h) Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. M/s. Rashi Injection Molders (2016)67 Taxmann.com 179 i) Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Priya Desh Gupta vs. Dy.CIT (2016) 70 Taxmann.com 258 j) Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Aryan Arcade Ltd vs. DCIT (1997) 92 Taxmann 534 k) Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Andhra Ba…

21 (Kar.) (e) CIT v. Lakshmi Trust Co. (167 Taxmann 27) — Cited in 7 Judgments | BharatTax