(2009) 308 ITR 168 (Delhi) 3. CIT v. Sarb Consulate Marine Products (P.) Ltd.

294 ITR 444High Court2007#5754 most cited

What is (2009) 308 ITR 168 (Delhi) 3. CIT v. Sarb Consulate Marine Products (P.) Ltd. authority for?

Revocation of a prohibitory order does not constitute the execution of a search for the purpose of computing the period of limitation for assessment.

20

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2020.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Sarb Consulate Marine Products P. Ltd. · 294 ITR 444 · search execution · prohibitory order · assessment limitation · revocation order · no asset seized · continuation of search

Judgments citing (2009) 308 ITR 168 (Delhi) 3. CIT v. Sarb Consulate Marine Products (P.) Ltd.

(2009) 308 ITR 168 (Delhi) 3. CIT v. Sarb Consulate Marine Products (P.) Ltd. (294 ITR 444) — Cited in 20 Judgments | BharatTax