(2008) 14 SCC 186: ASLAM MOHAMMAD MERCHANT v. COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

11 SCC 628Reported decision2015#3370 most cited

What is (2008) 14 SCC 186: ASLAM MOHAMMAD MERCHANT v. COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS authority for?

There can be no estoppel against the law. If a mandatory procedure is not followed, the action will have no legal existence.

35

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Aslam Mohammad Merchant · 11 SCC 628 · 2015 SCC 628 · no estoppel against law · mandatory procedure · invalid action

Sections most often in play

Section 148Section 147Section 148ASection 144BSection 151ASection 130Section 69ASection 144

Issues it is cited on

section 144(b)section 115whsection 115wfsection 124(3)(a)section 124section 115wdsection 115wesection 151aorder under section 148a(d)section 124(3)section 120income escaping assessment

Judgments citing (2008) 14 SCC 186: ASLAM MOHAMMAD MERCHANT v. COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(1), HYDERABAD vs. DAGUMATI SWATHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue being devoid and bereft of any substance is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1638/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 13Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)Section 151A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1638/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2013-14) Income Tax Officer, VS. Dagumati Swathi, Ward-8(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN: FBMPS4778H (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri Phaneedra Nag, CA Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri A P Babu, Sr. AR Department Represented by सुनवाईसमा…

BILWA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee company is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1363/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 250

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1363/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20) Bilwa Infrastructure Limited, VS. Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad. Ward-1(1), PAN: AAECK3254B Hyderabad. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CA Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri AP Babu, Sr. AR (Hybrid Hearing)…

PALLAPU SRINIVASARAO (HUF),ALMASGUDA vs. ITO., WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1586/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 139(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1586/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2020-21) Pallappu Srinivasarao (HUF), VS. Income Tax Officer, Almasguda. Ward-9(1), PAN: AARHP5933Q Hyderabad. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri Satya Sai GVSS, CA Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr.AR Department Repre…

MOHD SHOAIB UR RAHMAN,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1561/HYD/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Jan 2026AY 2015-2016

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 69A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1561/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2015-16) Mohd. Shoaib UR Rahman, VS. Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad. Ward-4(1), PAN: BDZPR0279K Hyderabad. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri Akshay Surana, CA Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. AR Department Represented…

THILAK BABU BOPPANA,CHITTOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), TIRUPATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1628/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member), Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri M.M. Shabid SameerFor Respondent: Shri K. Vinoth Kannan, Sr
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148A

….com 290/165 SCL 703 (SC)/[2021] 6 SCC 707 and again in the case of Union of India v. Mahendra Singh [CAP No. 4807 of 2022, dated 25-7-2022]. In the case of Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (preventive) Jam Nager [2015] 58 taxmann.com 126/[2015] 11 SCC 628, wherein it has been held that there can be no stopple against the law. If the law requires something to be done in a particular manner, then it must be done in that manner, if it is not done in that manner then it would have no existence in the eye of law. In paragraph 18 of the said judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under: "The Tribuna…

THE OOKAL FARMERS SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,WARANGAL vs. ITO., WARD-1, WARANGAL

In the result, all three appeals of the assesssee, i

ITA 1145/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1143/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2015-16) The Ookal Farmers Service VS. ITO, Cooperative Society Limited, Ward-1, Warangal. Warangal. PAN: AACAT0993J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1144/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2016-17) The Ookal Farmers Service VS. ITO, Cooperative Societ…

THE OOKAL FARMERS SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,WARANGAL vs. ITO., WARD-1, WARANGAL

In the result, all three appeals of the assesssee, i

ITA 1144/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1143/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2015-16) The Ookal Farmers Service VS. ITO, Cooperative Society Limited, Ward-1, Warangal. Warangal. PAN: AACAT0993J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1144/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2016-17) The Ookal Farmers Service VS. ITO, Cooperative Societ…

THE OOKAL FARMERS SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,WARANGAL vs. ITO., WARD-1, WARANGAL

In the result, all three appeals of the assesssee, i

ITA 1143/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1143/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2015-16) The Ookal Farmers Service VS. ITO, Cooperative Society Limited, Ward-1, Warangal. Warangal. PAN: AACAT0993J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1144/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2016-17) The Ookal Farmers Service VS. ITO, Cooperative Societ…

KRISHNAVENI KOKKULA,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 558/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us:

Section 147Section 69A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘SMC’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 558/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2016-17) Krishnaveni Kokkula, VS. Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad. Ward-9(1), PAN: CYXPK8722Q Hyderabad. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri Kumar Pal Tated, CA Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri T. Venkanna, Sr. AR Department Represented b…

DILEEP KUMAR SAKAMURI CHENCHU VENKATA,SRIKALAHASTI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), TIRUPATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1615/HYD/2025[AY 2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Dec 2025

Bench: Us:

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 234CSection 23BSection 250Section 69A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1615/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2015-16) Dileep Kumar Sakamuri VS. Income Tax Officer, Chenchu Venkata, Ward-1(3), Srikalahasti. Tirupati. PAN: ABMPD8319E (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri Abhiroo Bhargav, CA Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri Waseem UR Rehman, Sr. AR…

VENKATA RAMA KRISHNAM RAJU CHINTALAPATI,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 144/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Us.

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.144/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20) Venkata Rama Krishnam Raju VS. Deputy Commissioner of Income Chintalapati, Tax, Circle-8(1), PAN:AFKPC3305H Hyderabad. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri KA Sai Prasad, CA & CA P. Yashodhan Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri Wasee…

MANIKUMARI SAMANCHI,ZAHEERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SANGAREDDY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1345/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 14BSection 69A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1344/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2015-16) Manikumari Samanchi, VS. Income Tax Officer, Zaheerabad. Ward-1, PAN: CKPPS3895A Sangareddy. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1345/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2016-17) Manikumari Samanchi, VS. Income Tax Officer, Zaheerabad. Ward-1, PAN:…

MANIKUMARI SAMANCHI,ZAHEERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SANGAREDDY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1344/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 14BSection 69A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1344/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2015-16) Manikumari Samanchi, VS. Income Tax Officer, Zaheerabad. Ward-1, PAN: CKPPS3895A Sangareddy. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1345/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2016-17) Manikumari Samanchi, VS. Income Tax Officer, Zaheerabad. Ward-1, PAN:…

SIVA SANKARA REDDY TUNGA,HYDERABAD. vs. ITO., WARD - 14(1), HYDERABAD.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1060/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us:

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1060/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2016-17) Siva Sankara Reddy Tunga, VS. Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad. Ward-14(1), PAN: APIPT1664C Hyderabad. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CA Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR Department Represen…

MADURAI TUTICORIN EXPRESSWAYS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE - 5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all three appeals of the assesssee, i

ITA 1143/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1143/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2015-16) The Ookal Farmers Service VS. ITO, Cooperative Society Limited, Ward-1, Warangal. Warangal. PAN: AACAT0993J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1144/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2016-17) The Ookal Farmers Service VS. ITO, Cooperative Societ…

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc.,

ITTA/108/2022HC Telangana25 Sept 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

…the enhanced value as determined without protest, its claim for refund would be barred by virtue of Section 27 of the Act. Rejecting that contention, the Division Bench in CISCO Systems had held: 11 (2015) 11 SCC 628 12 2023 SCC OnLine Del 509 Digitally Signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:27.11.2024 18:20:25 Signature Not Verified CUSAA 26/2022 & connected matters Page 54 of 137 ―19. In the aforesaid context, the only issue to be addressed is whether filing of an appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 25/26.08.2004…

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s. Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.

ITTA/94/2022HC Telangana24 Aug 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

…the enhanced value as determined without protest, its claim for refund would be barred by virtue of Section 27 of the Act. Rejecting that contention, the Division Bench in CISCO Systems had held: 11 (2015) 11 SCC 628 12 2023 SCC OnLine Del 509 Digitally Signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:27.11.2024 18:20:25 Signature Not Verified CUSAA 26/2022 & connected matters Page 54 of 137 ―19. In the aforesaid context, the only issue to be addressed is whether filing of an appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 25/26.08.2004…

PRINCIPAL COMNR. OF INCOME TAX, SAMBALPUR RANGE vs. M/S. TATA SPONGE IRON LTD.

ITA/96/2022HC Orissa17 Aug 2023

Bench: MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

…the enhanced value as determined without protest, its claim for refund would be barred by virtue of Section 27 of the Act. Rejecting that contention, the Division Bench in CISCO Systems had held: 11 (2015) 11 SCC 628 12 2023 SCC OnLine Del 509 Digitally Signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:27.11.2024 18:20:25 Signature Not Verified CUSAA 26/2022 & connected matters Page 54 of 137 ―19. In the aforesaid context, the only issue to be addressed is whether filing of an appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 25/26.08.2004…

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI vs. SERVANTS OF PEOPLE SOCIETY

ITA/27/2022HC Delhi11 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

…the enhanced value as determined without protest, its claim for refund would be barred by virtue of Section 27 of the Act. Rejecting that contention, the Division Bench in CISCO Systems had held: 11 (2015) 11 SCC 628 12 2023 SCC OnLine Del 509 Digitally Signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:27.11.2024 18:20:25 Signature Not Verified CUSAA 26/2022 & connected matters Page 54 of 137 ―19. In the aforesaid context, the only issue to be addressed is whether filing of an appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 25/26.08.2004…

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI vs. SERVANTS OF PEOPLE SOCIETY

ITA/26/2022HC Delhi11 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

…the enhanced value as determined without protest, its claim for refund would be barred by virtue of Section 27 of the Act. Rejecting that contention, the Division Bench in CISCO Systems had held: 11 (2015) 11 SCC 628 12 2023 SCC OnLine Del 509 Digitally Signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:27.11.2024 18:20:25 Signature Not Verified CUSAA 26/2022 & connected matters Page 54 of 137 ―19. In the aforesaid context, the only issue to be addressed is whether filing of an appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 25/26.08.2004…

Showing 1–20 of 35 · Page 1 of 2