20. In Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Others v. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. Ferns
295 CTR 466High Court2017#4076 most cited
What is 20. In Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Others v. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. Ferns authority for?
A statement made under Section 132(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, cannot, on its own, without corroborating material found during a search and seizure operation, empower the Assessing Officer to frame a block assessment.
29
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.
Also referred to as
Pr. CIT v. Meeta Gutgutia · section 132(4) · incriminating material · block assessment · search and seizure · evidentiary value · retraction of statement · Kabul Chawla · Anand Kumar Jain
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing 20. In Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Others v. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. Ferns
Showing 1–20 of 29 · Page 1 of 2