196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO

110 Taxmann.com 307High Court2019#5180 most cited

What is 196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO authority for?

Exemption under section 10(38) on sale of shares is rightly disallowed where the transaction was an arranged affair to convert unaccounted money through accommodation entries and the assessee failed to prove its genuineness.

22

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Pooja Ajmani v. ITO · 110 Taxmann.com 307 · section 10(38) · capital gains · penny stock · accommodation entries · genuineness of transaction · onus of proof · long term capital gains · share application money

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO

Showing 120 of 22 · Page 1 of 2

196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO (110 Taxmann.com 307) — Cited in 22 Judgments | BharatTax