196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO

110 Taxmann.com 307High Court2019#5171 most cited

What is 196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO authority for?

The onus is on the assessee to prove the genuineness of long-term capital gains (LTCG) through sufficient documentary evidence of purchase, sale, and holding period, especially when allegations of providing bogus LTCG arise.

22

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Pooja Ajmani v. ITO · 110 Taxmann.com 307 · section 10(38) · section 143(3) · section 68 · long term capital gains · bogus LTCG · onus of proof · share application money · penny stock · addition under section 68

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO

196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO (110 Taxmann.com 307) — Cited in 22 Judgments | BharatTax