196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO
110 Taxmann.com 307High Court2019#5180 most cited
What is 196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO authority for?
Exemption under section 10(38) on sale of shares is rightly disallowed where the transaction was an arranged affair to convert unaccounted money through accommodation entries and the assessee failed to prove its genuineness.
22
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2024.
Also referred to as
Pooja Ajmani v. ITO · 110 Taxmann.com 307 · section 10(38) · capital gains · penny stock · accommodation entries · genuineness of transaction · onus of proof · long term capital gains · share application money
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing 196(Bombay) 3. Pooja Ajmani v. ITO
Showing 1–20 of 22 · Page 1 of 2