M/S.. UPKAR INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stand allowed
ITA 6710/DEL/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Jun 2016AY 2003-04
Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Kanta.Y. : 2003-04 Upkar International (P) Ltd., Dcit, Circle 18(1), C/O J.S. Kochar & Associates, Vs. Cr Building, 209, Sewak Bhawan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi 16/2, Wea Karol Bagh, New Delhi – 110 005
For Appellant: Sh. J.S. Kochar & Sh. Udai BirFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Jain, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80Section 801BSection 80I
…rom the industrial undertaking which must itself be the source of that profit. 7 A.Y. 2003-04 The legal position on interpretation of the term "derived from" was settled by the Privy Council in the case of en Vs. Raja Bahadur Kamakhya Narain Singh (1948) 16 ITR 325. In that case it was pointed out that the word "derived" is hot a term of art. Its use in the definition demanded an inquiry into the genealogy of the product. The question in that case was whether interest in respect of arrears of rent payable for land which was used for agricultural purposes would also be agriculture. The claim on behalf of th…