191 (Karnataka); Franchise India Brands Ltd. v. CPC, ITAT Delhi

122 Taxmann.com 196Reported decision2020#3644 most cited

What is 191 (Karnataka); Franchise India Brands Ltd. v. CPC, ITAT Delhi authority for?

Orders levying late fee under Section 234E are liable to be set aside if the authorities below have erred in sustaining the levy.

32

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Franchise India Brands Ltd. v. CPC · ITAT Delhi · Section 234E · late fee · levy of penalty · set aside order · rectification under section 154 · Section 200A · Section 220(2) · Section 143(1)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 191 (Karnataka); Franchise India Brands Ltd. v. CPC, ITAT Delhi

Showing 120 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

191 (Karnataka); Franchise India Brands Ltd. v. CPC, ITAT Delhi (122 Taxmann.com 196) — Cited in 32 Judgments | BharatTax