185 Taxman 44 (Delhi) (ii) CIT v. DCM Ltd.

59 Taxmann.com 180High Court2015#21227 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2024.

Judgments citing 185 Taxman 44 (Delhi) (ii) CIT v. DCM Ltd.

IHHR HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 04, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3109/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Yogesh Kumar Usm/S. Ihhr Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Addl. Cit, 32/7, Samalka, Nh 8, Range – 04, New Delhi – 110 037. New Delhi. (Pan : Aaaci9385B) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ranjan Chopra, Ca Revenue By : Shri Javed Akhtar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 30.05.2024 Date Of Order : 04.06.2024 Order Per Shamim Yahya: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit (Appeals)-35, New Delhi Dated 13.02.2018 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Taken By The Assessee Read As Under :- “1. That The Revenue Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Making Disallowance Of ‘Project Pending Capitalization Written Off’ Expenses, Amounting To Rs.7,71,40,000/- & Treating These Expenses To Be Of Capital Nature. 2. That The Revenue Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Disallowing Interest Of Rs.5,40,62,940/- U/S 36(1)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. (Revised Ground). 3. That The Revenue Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Disallowing A Sum Of Rs.9,61,305/- On Account Of Claim Of Roc Fee Under Section 35D Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2 .”

For Appellant: Shri Ranjan Chopra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Javed Akhtar, CIT DR
Section 35DSection 36(1)(iii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘C’ : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US, JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s. IHHR Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., vs. Addl. CIT, 32/7, Samalka, NH 8, Range – 04, New Delhi – 110 037. New Delhi. (PAN : AAACI9385B) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Ranjan Chopra, CA REVENUE BY : Shri Javed Akhtar, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 30.05.2024 Date of Order : 04.06.2024 ORDER PER SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals)-35, New Delhi dated 13.02.2018 for the assessment yea…

ITO, WARD, PARWANOO vs. BLUE COAST INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD., PARWANOO

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 143/CHANDI/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Jul 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri R.L Negiआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 143/Chd/2019 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 बनाम The Ito, Blue Coast Infrastructure Ward, Development Ltd., 7, Shopping Parwanoo Complex, Sector 1, Parwanoo Distt. Solan "थायीलेखासं./Pan No: Aabcm4010E अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Hearing Through Video Conferencing राज"वक"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Smt. C. Chandrakanta, Cit "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे/Assessee By : Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. C. Chandrakanta, CIT
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “A”,CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI R.L NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 143/CHD/2019 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 बनाम The ITO, Blue Coast Infrastructure Ward, Development Ltd., 7, Shopping Parwanoo Complex, Sector 1, Parwanoo Distt. Solan "थायीलेखासं./PAN NO: AABCM4010E अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Hearing through video Conferencing राज"वक"ओरसे/ Revenue by : Smt. C. Chandrakanta, CIT "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे/Assessee by : Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 27.04.2021 उदघोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pro…

185 Taxman 44 (Delhi) (ii) CIT v. DCM Ltd. (59 Taxmann.com 180) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax