13 ITR 415 (Patna) and CIT v. Viswanath Bhaskar Sathe

5 ITR 62High Court1937#9086 most cited

What is 13 ITR 415 (Patna) and CIT v. Viswanath Bhaskar Sathe authority for?

Depreciation may be allowed even if machinery is not actively in use or is kept idle. The term 'used for the purposes of the business' can be interpreted broadly to include passive use.

12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2022.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Dalmia Cement Ltd. · CIT v. Viswanath Bhaskar Sathe · depreciation · machinery not in use · idle machinery · passive use · active use · used for the purposes of business · section 32

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 13 ITR 415 (Patna) and CIT v. Viswanath Bhaskar Sathe

13 ITR 415 (Patna) and CIT v. Viswanath Bhaskar Sathe (5 ITR 62) — Cited in 12 Judgments | BharatTax