DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. JAGSON INTERNATIONAL LTD., NEW DELHI
In the result, ITA.No.276/Del
ITA 1002/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2022AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Narendra Kumar Choudhary
For Appellant: Shri Rahul PrabhakarFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Maurya, CIT
Section 115JSection 14A
…ing. The expression includes passive as well as active user. In CIT v. Dalmia Cement Ltd. [1945] 13 ITR 415 22 ITA.Nos.1001 & 1002/Del./2016 And ITA.No.276/Del./2017 M/s. Jagson International Ltd., New Delhi. (Patna) and CIT v. Viswanath Bhaskar Sathe [1937] 5 ITR 62 (Bom), it was observed that depreciation might be allowed in certain cases even though the machinery was not in use or was kept idle. The words "used for the purposes of the business" are capable of a larger and a narrower interpretation. If the expression "used" is construed strictly, it can be taken as connoting or requiring the active employment…