12th April 2103 in M/s Vanshee Builders & Developers P. Ltd. v. CIT

63 SOT 30Income Tax Appellate Tribunal#25537 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2020.

Judgments citing 12th April 2103 in M/s Vanshee Builders & Developers P. Ltd. v. CIT

FEDEX EXPRESS TRANPORTATION AND SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (INDIA) P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT 9, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3621/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Nov 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: D.T. Garasia & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2011-12 Fedex Express Transportation The Principal Commissioner Of & Supply Chain Services Income Tax – 9 Room No.214, 2Nd Floor, (India) Private Limited Boomerang, Unit No.801, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Vs. Wing-A, 8Th Floor, Mumbai - 400020 Chandivali Farm Road, Andheri (East) Mumbai - 400072 Pan: Aabcf6516A (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Jitendra Jain Revenue By : Shri S. Padmaja (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing : 15.09.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 17.11.2017 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra JainFor Respondent: Shri S. Padmaja (CIT-DR)
Section 119Section 139(5)Section 263

…210 of the Companies Act, 1956. 6. The learned AR relied upon the decision of CIT Vs. Nirav Modi 241 Taxmann 255, CIT Vs. Design and Automation Engineers 323 ITR 632, CIT Vs.Fine Jewellery (I) Ltd. 372 ITR 303, Vanshree Builders & Developers (P) Ltd. Vs. CIT 63 SOT 30, Escorts Mahle Ltd. Vs. DCIT 119 ITD 119 (Delhi), ACIT Vs. Pratap Rajasthan Special Steels Limited 99 TTJ 67 (Jaipur). 7. The learned DR submitted that the AO passed the order mechanically without application of mind on the basis of revised return income without appreciating that contradictory information has been given in original and revised retu…

12th April 2103 in M/s Vanshee Builders & Developers P. Ltd. v. CIT (63 SOT 30) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax