12th 46. Ed. 2017. 47. Shenothe Singh v. CIT

33 ITR 591High Court1958#24654 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2019.

Judgments citing 12th 46. Ed. 2017. 47. Shenothe Singh v. CIT

M/S ROSEMERY MECHANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,SILIGURI vs. I.T.O WD - 2(2),KOLKATA, SILIGURI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 422/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jan 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi] I.T.A. No. 422/Kol/2013 Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. Rosemery Merchants Pvt. Ltd..................................…………………………...........Appellant Barobisha, Near Girls School, Dakshin Rampur, Alipurduar, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal – 736207. [Pan: Aadcr 5312 A] Ito Ward 2(2) Siliguri....................…………………………………….............................Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, Matigara, Siliguri – 734 010. Appearances By: Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Nicholas Murmu, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 03, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 23, 2019 Order Per P.M. Jagtapthis Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A), Siliguri Dated 06.09.2012 Whereby He Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee In Limine By Treating The Same As Invalid.

Section 144Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (A), KOLKATA [Before Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice President & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member] I.T.A. No. 422/Kol/2013 Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/s. Rosemery Merchants Pvt. Ltd..................................…………………………...........Appellant Barobisha, Near Girls School, Dakshin Rampur, Alipurduar, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal – 736207. [PAN: AADCR 5312 A] ITO Ward 2(2) Siliguri....................…………………………………….............................Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, Matigara, Siliguri – 734 010. Appearances by: Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate appearing on behalf…

12th 46. Ed. 2017. 47. Shenothe Singh v. CIT (33 ITR 591) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax