HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT RG 1(1), MUMBAI
In the result we affirm the order of ld CIT(A) id affirmed and
ITA 5378/MUM/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Oct 2019AY 2006-07
Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya () & Shri Pawan Singh () Hindustan Petroleum The Addl.Cit, Range-1(1), Corporation Ltd., Mumbai 17, Jamashedji Tata Road, V/S Mumbai-400 020 Pan: Aaach1118B Appellant Respondent
Section 14ASection 37Section 37(1)
…ound No. 5 relates to deduction of leave encashment under section 43B. The ld. AR for the assessee submits that this expenditure was claimed during the assessment proceedings. The basis of deduction was the decision of Kolkata High Court in Exide Industries (254 ITR 428), wherein the provision of section 43B (f) was stuck down being arbitrary and unconscionable. The AO disallowed it by taking view that the claim was made after expiry of period of limitation for filing revised return under section 139(5). The Ld. DR relied upon the order of lower authorities. 18. We have considered the rival submissions of th…