VMS EVENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ADCIT, CPC, BANGALURU

PDF · subscribers
ITA 656/DEL/2021Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 August 2025AY 2012-13Bench: SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) had not considered the assessee's submissions on merits and had confirmed the addition based on an auditor's remark. The matter requires reconsideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed an order of the CIT(A) that confirmed an addition made u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee claimed that service tax was not routed through P&L and no expenditure was claimed, relying on a High Court judgment. However, the CIT(A) did not consider the submissions on merits.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) properly considered the assessee's submissions on merits regarding service tax liability not routed through P&L?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 43B,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’: NEW DELHI

For Respondent: Shri S.K. Jadhav, CIT-DR
Hearing: 31/07/2025Pronounced: 31/07/2025

[ PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A) in short], dated 28.02.2021 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, in short) for Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. At the outset, from the perusal of the appellate order, it is seen that the assesse has filed written submission with respect to the addition made u/s 43B of the Act. The assessee in its submission claimed that the service tax was not routed through P&L Account and thus no expenditure was claimed. In this regard, reliance is placed on VMS Events Private Limited vs. ADCIT, CPC the judgment of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Nobel and Hewitt India Pvt. Ltd. [2008] 305 ITR 324 (Del.) However, Ld. CIT(A) has not considered the submissions of assessee on merits and confirm the addition based on auditor remark in tax audit report. Under these circumstances, in our considered opinion, matter needs reconsideration on merits of the issue. Accordingly, we set aside the order of Ld. CIT(A) and restore back the appeal to his file with the directions to decide the same in the light of submission of the assessee and also keeping in mind the amendments made in the Act. The assesse is also directed to file all the necessary details/submission in respect of the claim made that no expenses was claimed on account of service tax in terms of amended law.

3.

In view of the above directions, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 31.07.2025. (PRAKASH CHAND YADAV) (MANISH AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 28.08.2025 PK/Ps

More judgments on Section 43B

All 7,161 judgments and leading authorities on Section 43B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →