M/S. BEST FOODS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT, GURGAON
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, in the absence of any contrary material and given the assessee's non-appearance, declined to interfere with the PCIT's order. The PCIT's direction for further verification was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the PCIT's order under Section 263. The PCIT noted that the AO had not adequately examined the maintenance of separate books, compliance with Form 10CCB, verification of construction costs for specified businesses, and usage of a new warehouse.
What were the issues?
Whether the Assessing Officer's assessment was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, necessitating revision under Section 263.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Saktijit DeyDr. B. R. R. Kumar
ORDER
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. PCIT, Central, Gurgaon dated 10.03.2017.
The assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal in June 2017. During the hearings conducted none appeared on 03.08.2021, 07.10.2021, 13.12.2021, 14.02.2022, 21.04.2022, 28.07.2022, 02.08.2022, 16.11.2022, 16.02.2023 and 27.04.2023.
The ld. PCIT passed order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 10.03.2027 and held that the AO has not examined whether separate books have been maintained and compliance of statutory report in Form 10CCB has been duly made. The ld. PCIT has also held that the AO has not verified the cost of Best Foods Ltd. construction of setting up of specified business and no examination has been done with regard to usage of new warehouse.
We have gone through the material on record. In the absence of any material contra, we decline to interfere with the order of the ld. PCIT.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 28/06/2023.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026