ARUN SOPAN ADATE,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 (1), SOLAPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the ends of justice would be met by setting aside the impugned ex parte orders. The matter was restored to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh orders after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed four appeals against ex parte orders passed by the CIT(A) for assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2009-10. Reassessment proceedings were initiated and assessments were completed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeals ex parte without providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘SMC’ PUNE – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
restored to the file of the ld. CIT(A). We order accordingly and direct the ld. CIT(A) to pass the orders afresh as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, all the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 06th October, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; िदनांक Dated : 06th October, 2021 सतीश आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 1. ��थ� / The CIT(A)-1, Pune 2. 3. The Pr.CIT-1, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘SMC’ Bench, Pune गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 5.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026