No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, ‘A’ CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & Ms. ANNAPURNA GUPTA
Per Bench:
The present bunch of appeals has been preferred by the
assessee against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income
Tax(Appeals)-3, Ludhiana [hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)] dated
26.12.2017.
ITA Nos.225 to 234/Chd/2018 Shri Narjinder Singh Sekhn, Patiala 2
ITA Nos. 225 to 229/Chd/2018 are against the quantum
additions, whereas, ITA Nos. 230 to 234/Chd/2018 are against the
penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short
'the Act').
In all the appeals, it has been pleaded by the assessee that he
is a retired government officer and is an old chronic patient of
diabetic and has been on regular treatment for the same for the last
25 years. That due to his bad health, he could not attend the
proceedings before the Assessing officer and, hence, could not
comply with the notices issued by the Assessing officer from time to
time. That due to his disease, he has also become short of memory.
It has been further stated that the additions made by the Assessing
officer were not justified as the assessee has reasonable explanation
in respect of the additions made by Assessing officer on account of
interest. That the assessee had made submissions before the CIT(A),
however, the CIT(A) did not look into the submissions of the
assessee and confirmed the additions and the penalty on the grounds
that the assessee could not furnish the relevant details / explanation
to the Assessing officer.
After going through the records and the impugned orders of the
Assessing officer as well as of the CIT(A), we are of the view that
the interest of justice will be well served, if the assessee is given an
opportunity to present his case before the Assessing officer. The
Assessing officer will not only consider the submissions of the
assessee regarding the impugned additions but also the plea of the
ITA Nos.225 to 234/Chd/2018 Shri Narjinder Singh Sekhn, Patiala 3
assessee regarding his inability to comply with the notices and then to decide the matters afresh. All the above appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court
Sd/- Sd/- (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) (SANJAY GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated : 17.05.2018 Rkk Copy to: • The Appellant • The Respondent • The CIT • The CIT(A) • The DR