UTSAV COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-11(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities and remitted the matter back to the AO for fresh adjudication. This was based on the assessee's submission that the evidence was not properly considered and the concurrence of the Revenue's representative.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns an addition of Rs. 9.88 lacs made by the AO on account of unexplained share application money under Section 68. The assessee contended that the lower authorities failed to examine the creditworthiness, genuineness, and identity of the share applicants despite submissions of relevant details.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition on account of unexplained share application money was justified without proper examination of the creditworthiness, genuineness, and identity of the investors.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
This appeal by assessee is arising out of order of CIT(A)-XII, Kolkata in Appeal No.728/XII/11(2)/09-10 dated 09.07.2012. Assessment was framed by ITO, Ward-11(2), Kolkata, u/s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for AY 2007-08 vide its order dated 30.12.2009.
The only issue in this appeal of assessee is against the order of CIT(A) confirming the action of AO in making addition of Rs.9.88 lacs on account of unexplained share application u/s. 68 of the Act.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that neither the AO nor CIT(A) has gone into the creditworthiness, genuineness of transaction and identity of the parties despite the fact that all details were filed before the lower authorities. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to the findings of CIT(A) at page 3 of his order and also the findings of the AO and stated that despite specific information relating to the share applications were filed before both the authorities below but none of the authorities have deliberated on the same. In view of this, ld. Counsel for the assessee argued that the issue can be remitted back to the file of the AO for fresh examination and the evidence which are already available before the AO. On query from the bench, ld. Sr. DR did not controvert the statement of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee and concurred with the proposal of the Ld. Counsel that the issue can be remitted to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. Accordingly, I set aside the orders of the lower authorities and remit the matter back to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication as per law. Appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is pronounced in the open court. Sd/-(Mahavir Singh) Judicial Member Dated : 10th December, 2015 Jd. Sr. P.S
2 Utsab Commercial Pvt. Ltd. AY 2007-08 Copy of the order forwarded to: APPELLANT – Utsab Commercial Pvt. Ltd., C/o, D.J. Shah & Co., Kalyan 1. Bhavan, 2, Elgin Road, Kolkata-700 020 Respondent – ITO, Ward-11(2), Kolkata. 2 The CIT(A), Kolkata 3. 4. CIT Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata /True Copy, By order,
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026