MADHU S. JHUNJHUNWALA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR 11, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal heard the DR and perused the records. Since the assessee failed to furnish any material to challenge the CIT(A)'s reasoned order on share transactions and cash credits, the CIT(A)'s order was confirmed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2007-08. The assessee did not appear for the hearing despite proper notice.
What were the issues?
The appeal involved the issues of loss incurred in share transactions and unexplained cash credits.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
अऩीरधथी ओय से / Appellant by None प्रत्मथी की ओय से/ Respondent by Shri N P Singh सुनवधई की तधयीख / Date of Hearing : 14.3.2016 घोषणध की तधयीख /Date of Pronouncement: 14.3.2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per B R Baskaran, AM:
The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 17.6.2010 passed by the ld.CIT(A)-37, Mumbai and it relates to the assessment year 2007-08.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee even though the notice was served to the assessee by RPAD earlier. Hence, we proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte without the presence of the assessee.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026