M/S. ARTEX APPARELS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT-I, AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee wished to withdraw its appeal and the Departmental Representative had no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order passed by the CIT under Section 263. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw its appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
ITA No. 2071/Ahd/2014 Artex Apparels vs. CIT Assessment year: 2009-10 Page 1 of 2
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
[Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and Rajpal Yadav JM]
ITA No.2071/Ahd/2014 Assessment year: 2009-10
M/s. Artex Apparels .......…………......Appellant 641/54, Anand Hall, Kapasia Bazaar, Kalupur, Ahmedabad - 380008 [PAN: AAEFA 7531 J]
Vs.
The Commissioner of Income-tax-I .......................Respondent Ahmedabad
Appearances by: Urvashi Shodhan for the appellant VK Singh for the respondent
Date of concluding the hearing : 19.09.2017 Date of pronouncing the order : 19.09.2017
O R D E R Per Pramod Kumar AM:
This appeal of assessee for Assessment Year 2009-10 is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad-1, Ahmedabad dated 28.01.2014, arising out of order under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee wants to withdraw its appeal. The learned Departmental Representative has no objection. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as indicated above. Pronounced in the open court today on the 19th day of September, 2017.
Sd/- Sd/-
Rajpal Yadav Pramod Kumar (Judicial Member) (Accountant Member) Ahmedabad, the 19th day of September, 2017 **bt
ITA No. 2071/Ahd/2014 Artex Apparels vs. CIT Assessment year: 2009-10 Page 2 of 2
Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) Commissioner (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026