SHRI. REVANASIDDESHWAR CO-OPERATIVE vs. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

PDF · subscribers
WP/47211/2013HC KarnatakaKAHC03000007201331 October 2013Bench: RAM MOHAN REDDY3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The Court noted that since the payment has already been made, the writ petition has become infructuous. The petitioner is granted liberty to seek a refund in their pending appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal if successful.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, a Co-operative Society, challenged a notice issued by the Income Tax Department to its bankers for recovery of amounts due. The petitioner's bankers have already made the payment as per the notice.

What were the issues?

Whether a writ petition challenging a recovery notice is maintainable after the payment has been made. The issue of seeking refund in the pending appeal before the ITAT.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 226(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench, Pundalik Niwas,

Before: Shri Revanasiddeshwar Co-operative Represented by.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA GULBARGA BENCH DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY W.P.No.47211/2013 (T-IT) BETWEEN: Shri Revanasiddeshwar Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Horti At: Po: Horti, Taluk, Indi Dist: Bijapur – 586 117 Represented by President.

... Petitioner (By Sri Ashok A. Kulkarni, Advocate) AND: 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Panaji Bench, Pundalik Niwas, 1st Floor, Near Pota Bridge PANAJI, GOA – 403 001. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Aayakar Bhavan Athani Road, Bijapur – 586 101. ... Respondents This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the notice in Annexure-E No.P.A.N./G.I.R. No.AABAS3319N dated 01.10.2013.

2 This writ petition coming on for preliminary hearing on this day, the Court made the following: ORDER Petitioner, a Co-operative Society, aggrieved by the order of the assessing authority under The Income Tax Act declining deductions, preferred an appeal, said to be pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, together with an application for stay and recovery of the amount. In the meanwhile, department is said to have issued notice under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Annexure-E addressed to the bankers of the petitioner-bank to pay the amounts due from out of the accounts maintained by the assessee. Petitioner in this petition is calling in question the said notice, Annexure-E. 2. According to the learned counsel, petitioner’s bankers have since made payment pursuant to the notice, Annexure-E and therefore, petition has become

3 infructuous. If that is so, this petition deserves to be rejected, reserving liberty to the petitioner to make necessary application in the appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal seeking refund of the amount, in the event of success in the appeal. Sd/-

JUDGE kcm

More judgments on Section 226(3)

All 95 judgments and leading authorities on Section 226(3) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →