VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The petitioner filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted the permission and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
Vodafone South Limited filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order and stay a demand notice related to the assessment year 2014-15. The company also sought directions for the respondent to consider its stay application.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition filed against an income tax order and demand notice.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.12686/2015(T-IT)
BETWEEN: VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VODAFONE SOUTH ESSAR LIMITED) MARUTHI INFOTECH CENTRE, NO.11/1, 12/1, KORAMANGALA AMAR JYOTHI LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 071 REPRESENTED BY SENIOR MANAGER SRI ANUJ KUMAR SINGH. ..PETITIONER
(BY SRI.ARAVIND V CHAVAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 1(1), NO.14/3A, 6TH FLOOR, RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA RAOD, BENGALURU- 560 001
2 2.DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NO.14/3A, 6TH FLOOR, RASHTOTHANA BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNBGA ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 001
3.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-12 NO.14/3, RASHTROTHNA BHAVAN, 5TH FLOOR NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001 ..RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO:
QUASH THE ORDER DATED.23.03.2015 PASSED BY THE R- 3 VIDE ANNEXURE-R FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014- 15.
DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO ENFORCE THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R-1 DATED:18.02.2015 ANNEXURE-C AND LETTER DATED:11.03.2015 ANNEXURE- D PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [APPEALS]- 12 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15.
DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED BEFORE THE R-1 DATED:16.03.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-G FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3 ORDER
Memo is filed seeking permission of the court to withdraw the above writ petition. Memo is placed on record. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
SBN
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026