SRI VENKATESHWARA EDUCATIONAL & vs. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court declined to interfere with the rejection, citing that the cause of action fully arose in Andhra Pradesh, where the petitioner's institution is located.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, an educational trust, applied to the National Council for Teacher Education to start a D.El.Ed. course. Their application was rejected, leading them to file a writ petition.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Karnataka High Court had jurisdiction to hear the petition, given that the cause of action arose in Andhra Pradesh.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Rajendran Chingaravelu v. R.K. Mishra15 citing1 SCC 457 · 2010
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF AUGUST 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29087 OF 2012 (EDN-REG-P) BETWEEN SRI VENKATESHWARA EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST BY ITS SECRETARY DR K ASHA JOTHI, KOTUR VILLAGE T KUPPAM POST BANGARUPALYAM-517416 CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. M N PRASANNA, ADV.) AND NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION A STATUTORY BODY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT NAGARABHAVI, JNANA BHARATHI CAMPUS ROAD, OPP: NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL BANGALORE-560072, REP.BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS LEADING TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF 227TH MEETING OF THE RESPONDENT
2 AND QUASH DECISION OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE - NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION TAKEN IN ITS 227TH MEETING HELD ON 17TH- 19TH JULY 2012 VIDE ANNEX-J TO THE WRIT PETIITON, BY ISSUE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI IN SO FAR AS IT CONCERNS THE PETITIONER LISTED AT SL. NO.43 OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO IMMEDIATELY CONVENE A MEETING OF THE SRC-NCTE TO DECIDE AND GRANT THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER TO START D.EI.ED COURSE AT ITS INSTITUTION
AFTER
INSPECTION
AND
OTHER INCIDENTIAL FORMALITIES DURING THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2012-13 FORTHWITH; AND ETC. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRL.HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Petitioner with an intention to commence a course in Diploma in Elementary Education Programme (D.El.Ed.) in the State of Andhra Pradesh, having made an application to the respondent – National Council for Teacher Education, Bangalore, which when rejected, has presented this petition. 2. The Apex Court in RAJENDRAN CHINGARAVELU VS. R.K.MISHRA, ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &
3 ORS.1, having regard to Art.226(2) of the Constitution of India, observed that even if a fraction of the cause of action accrued within the territories of a State, High Court of that State will have the jurisdiction. Applying the same to the facts of this case, admittedly the petitioner - educational institution at Chittoor seeking to commence the course in question, the cause of action having fully arisen in the State of Andhra Pradesh, I decline to interfere. Petition rejected. Sd/- JUDGE rd/- 1 (2010) 1 SCC 457
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Central Board of Direct Taxes vs Smt Anuradha GoyalKarnataka18 Apr 2022Dismissed
Also relies on Rajendran Chingaravelu v. R.K. Mishra
The High Court held that a change in law by a subsequent coordinate bench, without bringing it to the notice of the court during the original hearing, is not a valid ground for review. The court found no apparent error o...
- Pr Commissioner of Income Tax - 9 vs M/S Ufo Moviez Inida LtdDelhi17 Oct 2016Partly Allowed
Also relies on Rajendran Chingaravelu v. R.K. Mishra
The tribunal quashed one charge sheet and set aside the disciplinary authority's order, remanding the matter for a fresh decision on another charge sheet. The compulsory retirement was deemed to relate back to the date o...
- Prakash V Sanghvi vs Mr Ramesh GKarnataka20 Mar 2013Partly Allowed
Also relies on Rajendran Chingaravelu v. R.K. Mishra
The tribunal held that the Income Tax officer did not have the authority to set up a camp office in the petitioner's residence and issue a summons under Section 131. However, the search and seizure under Section 132 were...
- Sinder Pal S/O Late Sh. Ram Sarup vs Commissioner of Customs, Inland Container…Delhi16 Sept 2026Dismissed
Also decided under Section 227 with the same outcome
The High Court held that it ought not to entertain the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution due to the availability of an efficacious alternate statutory remedy. The Court noted that the Petitione...
- Erappa vs The Deputy CommissionerKarnataka16 Nov 2022Dismissed
Also decided under Section 227 with the same outcome
The court held that the petitioner's explanation for the 25-year delay in filing the writ petition lacked credibility. The court also noted that the petitioner's averments in this petition conflicted with those made in a...
More judgments on Section 227
- Sinder Pal S/O Late Sh. Ram Sarup vs Commissioner of Customs, Inland Container…W.P.(C)-3002/202116 Sept 2026
- Sri Tontadarya B S vs The Superintendent of PoliceWP/4538/202212 Dec 2022
- Erappa vs The Deputy CommissionerWP/9257/201416 Nov 2022
- Pralaksha Charitable Trust vs State of KarnatakaWP/16109/202212 Sept 2022
- Smt Promoda Devi Wadiyar vs Bangalore Development AuthorityWP/2170/20156 Jul 2022
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026