SRI UDAY KALYAN N vs. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted the submission by the learned counsel for the appellants that the appeals had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals.
What were the facts?
The appellants filed writ appeals before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an earlier order. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeals had become infructuous, leading to their dismissal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR WA NOS.5463-68/2012(EDN-AD) BETWEEN : 1. SRI UDAY KALYAN N S/O N.SRINIVASA RAO AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/A BESIDE INCOME TAX OFFICE HN B56, GOPALA GOWDA EXTENSION, SHIMOGA SHIMOGA DISTRICT-590 112.
SRI RAKESH.S.N S/O S.H.NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS R/A NO.115BM, 5TH CROSS, IST STAGE, NEAR DVS COMPOSITE COLLEGE VINOBANAGAR, SHIMOGA SHIMOGA DISTRICT-590 112.
SRI PRATHAP.G S/O GANGADHAR.H.C AGED ABOU 18 YEARS R/A NO VEERAPURA SIRUR POST, BHADRAVATHI SHIMOGA DISTRICT-590 112.
SRI VISHAL.K S/O KUMAR.Y AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS R/A D.NO.36 M.R.S.NEW COLONY SHIMOGA SHIMOGA DISTRICT- 590 112. 5. SRI MITHAN KUMAR S/O MAHABALAPPA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS R/A SHARAVATHI NAGAR 6TH CROSS, SHIMOGA SHIMOGA DISTRICT-590 112.
SRI GANESH R PRASAD S/O P RAJENDRA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS R/A SHANKARAMMA CIRCLE ERAMMA COMPOUND B.H.ROAD, SHIMOGA SHIMOGA DISTRICT-590 112. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.R.ANIL KUMAR, ADV FOR KESVY & CO.,) AND : 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001
DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560 001
THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (TECHNICAL EDUCATION) M.S.BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 4. SAHYADARI POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE THIRTHAHALLI SHIMOGA DISTRICT-573 141 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL.
D.S.DINAKAR NATIONAL POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, SHIMOGA SHIMOGA DISTRICT-573 141 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VEDAMURTHY.T.K, AGA) WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.31943-31947/2012 AND WP.NO.32102/12 DATED 30/08/2012. THESE APPEALS ARE COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY K.SREEDHAR RAO,J, MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appeals have become infructuous. In view of the submissions made by the
4 learned counsel for the appellants, the appeals are dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE mpk/*
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026