Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A”, BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED, AM & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JM
O R D E R
Per Shri K. Narasimha Chary, JM:
This appeal by assessee is arising out of order dated 18.11.2013, passed by CIT(A)-XVI, Kolkata, for the assessment year 2006-2007, in the matter of imposition of penalty u/s.271(1)(B) of the I.T.Act.
None appeared for and on behalf of assessee at the time of hearing of this appeal. At the outset, it is noticed that this appeal was adjourned earlier on 20-7-16 at the behest of the assessee and the appeal was fixed for hearing on 04.10.2016. Today, i.e. on 04.10.2016 also none appeared on behalf of assessee. This being appeal filed in 2014, it seems that assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal as none is present before us at the time of hearing. Hence, the appeal of assessee is dismissed for non-prosecution applying the decision of Hon’ble Delhi Tribunal in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd., 38 ITD 320.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on this 04/10/2016.
Sd/- Sd/- (WASEEM AHMED) (NARASIMHA CHARY) लेखा सद�य / MEMBER ACCOUNTANT �या�यक सद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER कोलकाता /Kolkata; �दनांक Dated 04/10/2016 �काश �म�ा/Prakash Mishra,�न.स/ PS आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A), Kolkata. 4. आयकर आयु�त / CIT �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, कोलकाता / DR, ITAT, Kolkata 5. 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. स�या�पत ��त //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,