THE ITO, WARD-2(2)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. APEX DYES & INTERMEDIATES, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the CBDT circular no. 21/2015, which mandates withdrawal or non-pressing of departmental appeals with low tax effect. Consequently, both appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting the disallowance of interest expense for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The net tax effect in both appeals was below Rs. 10 lacs.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals with low tax effect should be withdrawn or not pressed as per CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH AHMEDABAD
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH AHMEDABAD
BEFORE, SHRI S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA Nos. 143 & 144/Ahd/2015 (Assessment Years: 2008-09 & 2009-10) The Income-tax Officer, Ward-2(2)(1), Ahmedabad, 1st Floor, C. U. Shah Bldg., Ashram Road, Ahmedabad- 380009 Appellant Vs. M/s. Apex Dyes & Intermediates, 7-B, Ajanta Commercial Centre, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad - 380014 Respondent
PAN: AADFA2959F
राज�व क� ओर से/By Revenue : Shri Keyur Patel, Sr. D.R. आवेदक क� ओर से/By Assessee : Shri R. C. Shah, A.R. सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 13.12.2017 घोषणा क� तार�ख/Date of Pronouncement : 13.12.2017 ORDER PER BENCH
These two Revenue’s appeals for assessment years 2008-09 & 2009-10 arise against the CIT(A)-XIV, Ahmedabad’s separate orders dated 17.10.2014 & 16.10.2014, in case nos. CIT(A)-XIV/Ward-7(3)/398/2013-14 & CIT(A)- XIV/Ward/7(3)/397/2013-14; respectively, in proceedings u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.
ITA Nos. 143 & 144/Ahd/15 [ITO vs. M/s. Apex Dyes & Intermediates] - 2 - A.Ys. 2008-09 & 2009-10
The Revenue’s substantive ground pleaded in the both appeals challenges the CIT(A)’s order deleting the disallowance of interest expense amounting to Rs.14,48,432/- in A.Y. 2008-09 and Rs.19,36,829/- in A.Y. 2009-10. There is no dispute that the net tax effect in both appeals is less than Rs.10 lacs. We find that the Central Board of Direct Taxes; hereafter the ‘Board’ has issued the circular no. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 clearly envisaging therein that department’s pending appeals before the tribunal/high courts are to be withdrawn/not pressed as per the above stated circular. The same has been declared to be having retrospective effect in other words. We take into consideration the above stated Board’s circular and dismiss both the appeals accordingly.
Revenue’s both appeals are dismissed as having low tax effect.
[Pronounced in the open Court on this the 13th day of December, 2017.]
Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (S. S. GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 13/12/2017 True Copy S.K.SINHA आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद ।
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026