FIDELITY MULTITRADE P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 1(1)(3), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee company, through its Director, submitted a letter requesting permission to withdraw the appeal. The Tribunal, in view of this request, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, M/s. Fidelity Multitrade P. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The appeal was listed for hearing on October 3, 2016.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw its appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal had to decide whether to grant this request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, F Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sandeep Gosain
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, 'the Act') vide order dated 20.03.2015 for A.Y. 2010-11. 2. At the outset of hearing of the appeal today, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted a letter dated 03.10.2016 addressed to the Bench by the Director of the assessee company seeking permission to withdraw this appeal. This letter reads as under: - “October 3, 2016
The Hon'ble Members Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Bench “F” Mumbai
Re: Fidelity Multitrade Pvt. Ltd. ITA No.: 3114/Mum/2015 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) Sub: Request for permission for withdrawal of appeal
M/s. Fidelity Multitrade P. Ltd. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOURS
This has reference to the captioned appeal hearing of which is fixed before Your Honours on 03.10.2016. In this connection we, the appellant, crave leave of Your Honour for withdrawal of the said appeal.
Your Honours’ faithfully,
For Fidelity Multitrade Pvt. Ltd. Sd/- Director Appellant” 3. In view of the letter of the Director of assessee company (supra), we dismiss this appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2010-11 (including the grounds raised
) as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026