M/S RATNABALI COMMODITIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-12(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Departmental Representative did not object to the withdrawal. The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order passed by the CIT(A). The assessment was originally framed by the Income Tax Officer under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed before the tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “D” KOLKATA
Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi
आदेश /O R D E R
PER Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member:-
This appeal has been filed by the assessee relating to Assessment Year 2010-11 is directed against the order passed by Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-XII, Kolkata dated 24.10.2014. Assessment was framed by ITO Ward No.-12(3) Kolkata u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) vide his order dated 19.03.2013.
Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, Ld. Authorized Representative appeared on behalf of assessee and Shri Sital Chandra Das, Ld. Departmental Representative appeared on behalf of Revenue. A.Y. 2010-11 M/s Ratanabali Commodities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO Wd-12(3) Kol. Page 2 2. At the outset, Ld. counsel for the assessee wished to seek permission for withdrawal of the appeal and Ld. DR has not objected the withdrawal of the same. As there is no objection from the Revenue, we permit the withdrawal of assessee’s appeal. Accordingly, this appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, assessee’s appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in open court on 17/01/2017 (S.S.Viswanethra Ravi) (Waseem Ahmed) Judicial Member Accountant Member *Dkp Sr.P.S �दनांकः- 17/01/2017 कोलकाता / Kolkata आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant-Rosewood Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. D.J. Shah & Co., 2, Elgin Road, Kol-20 2. ��यथ�/Respondent-Pr.CIT, Kolkata-1,P-7Chowringhee Sq, Aaykar Bhawan,Kol-69 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण कोलकाता / DR, ITAT, Kolkata 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026