No AI summary yet for this case.
- 1 -
WA No.100100/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MAY, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT
WRIT APPEAL NO. 100100 OF 2020 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, RAJPATH MARG, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI-110011, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO.1, BELAGAVI, FEROZ KHIMJIBHAI COMPLEX, OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI-590001. … APPELLANTS (BY SHRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ & SHRI TULAJAPPA KALBURGI, ADVOCATES)
J MAMATHA Digitally signed by J MAMATHA Location: DHARWAD Date: 2022.05.28 11:52:00 +0530
- 2 -
WA No.100100/2020
AND:
PRAGATHI CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMIT, 1, ATHANI ROAD, HURUGERI, AT POST: HURUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI-591220, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SHRI.BASAGOUDA S/O VENKAPPA BIRADAR, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: CEO, AT POST: HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI-591220.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI M.R. YARAGAMBLIMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SHRI G.K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVT. ADOVATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP.NO.118238/2020 (T-IT) DATED 28.01.2020 AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, KRISHNA S.DIXIT, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
- 3 -
WA No.100100/2020
JUDGMENT The subject matter of this appeal we are told is substantially similar to the one in W.A. No.378/2020 (T-IT) connected with W.A. No. 406/2020 (T-IT) between the Government of India & another Vs. Karnataka State Souharda Federal Co-operative Limited and another, disposed off by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20th December 2021. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant does not, in all fairness, dispute the above position as contended by learned counsel appearing for the respondent-assessee. Learned AGA too echoes the same. No case for deviating from the view taken by the said Co-ordinate Bench is made out before us, either. In the above circumstances, we find no merits to interfere in this appeal and accordingly, the same stands rejected. Pending applications, if any, pale
- 4 -
WA No.100100/2020
into insignificance in view of the rejection of the appeal. Costs made easy.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
Vnp*