BOUDEWIJN RENES vs. UNION OF INDIA
What did the High Court hold?
The Court took on record the memo filed by the petitioner seeking to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions to the FRRO to grant registration and to the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax to grant a tax compliance certificate/NOC. The petitioner later filed a memo seeking to withdraw the writ petition.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the petitioner's request for withdrawal of the writ petition, which the court then granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Article 226
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.9650/2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
BOUDEWIJN RENES S/O LAMBERTUS RENES, AGED 42 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FERNS RESIDENCY, PHASE-II, PLOT NO.14, KOTHANUR POST, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560077, KARNATAKA. ...PETITIONER (BY SMT. ADITI GURJER, ADV. FOR M/S. DUA ASSOCIATES, ADVS.)
AND:
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 5TH FLOOR, ‘A’ BLOCK, TTMC, BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.
FRRO BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, 5TH FLOOR, ‘A’ BLOCK, TTMC, BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING,
2 K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.
THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA AND GOA REPRESENTED BY STANDING COUNSEL PRO SECTION, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ADITYA SINGH, CGC FOR R1 & R2)
++++++
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO GRANT FRRO. REGISTRATION TO PETITIONER ON OR BEFORE 09.06.2020; DIRECT R-3 TO GRANT TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE/NOC TO PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF PETITIONERS STAY IN INDIA FOR THE PERIOD BETWEEN 25.11.2019 TO 2.6.2020 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo dated 18.08.2020 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
3 The memo is placed on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the memo.
Sd/-
JUDGE
mpk/-* CT:bms
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026