TLC UNIVERSAL PRIVATE LTD vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
What did the High Court hold?
The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted this permission, disposing of the petition as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, TLC Universal Private Ltd, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 25.02.2015 passed by the Income Tax Officer (TDS) and to direct the officer to consider the declared tax amount as proper. The petitioner also sought to prohibit coercive steps based on the impugned order.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the petitioner's challenge to an order passed by the Income Tax Officer (TDS) and their request for a direction regarding the declared tax amount.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.19876/2022 (T-IT) BETWEEN:
TLC UNIVERSAL PRIVATE LTD HAVING ITS OFFICE ADDRESS AT NO.114, 7TH CROSS, BEHIND ST.JOHNS SCHOOL, COFFEE BOARD PARK, KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE -560 024 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
… PETITIONER (BY SRI K.MALLAHARAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009
2 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), 4TH FLOOR, HMT BHAVAN, NO.59, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 024
3 . THE INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS WARD 3(3), BANGALORE
4 . THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER TDS, BANGALORE.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 25.02.2015, PASSED BY THE R3 IN ORDER BEARING F.NO.BLRT07184C/TDS/ 2012-13 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE R3, TO CONSIDER THAT THE DECLARED TAX AMOUNT BY THE PETITIONER, IS PROPER AND CORRECT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this writ petition, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: "(i) Issue Writ of Certiorari or in the like nature of writ, quashing the impugned order dated 25.02.2015, passed by the respondent No.3 in order bearing F.No.BLRT07184C/TDS/2012-13, vide Annexure-A.
(ii) Writ of mandamus or in the like nature of writ of direction, directing the respondent No.3, to consider that the declared tax amount by the petitioner, is proper and correct;
(iii) Writ of prohibition, directing the concerned respondent authorities to refrain from taking coercive steps or measures, prohibiting them from taking action on the basis of the impugned order dated 25.02.2015, passed by the respondent No.3 in order
bearing F.No.BLRT07184C/TDS/2012-13, vide Annexure-A; and
(iv) Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of this case, in the interest of justice and equity."
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition in accordance with law.
His submission is placed on record. Writ Petition is disposed off as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to take recourse to such remedy as available in law including filing of a writ petition.
SD/- JUDGE
PKS
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026