Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri M. Balaganesh, AM & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, JM]
ORDER
Per Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, JM:
This appeal preferred by assessee arises out of the order of CIT(A), Central-II, Kolkata vide appeal No. 121/CC-XVIII/CIT(A)C-II/11-12 dated 24.01.2014.
None appeared for and on behalf of assessee at the time of hearing of this appeal. At the outset, it is noticed that on the last date of hearing i.e. on 17.01.2017 the case was adjourned to 02.03.2017. Today, i.e. on 02.03.2017 none appeared on behalf of the assessee. It seems that assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal as none is present before us at the time of hearing or no communication has been made by the assessee in respect of any adjournment. Hence, the appeal of assessee is dismissed for non-prosecution applying the decision of Hon’ble Delhi Tribunal in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd., 38 ITD 320. 3. In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed.
Order is pronounced in the open court. Sd/- sd/- (M. Balaganesh) (Partha Sarathi Chaudhury,) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated : 2nd March, 2017 Jd.(Sr.P.S.)
Copy of the order forwarded to:
APPELLANT – Damodar Repeways & Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., 1/A, 1. Vansittart Row, Kolkata-700 001. Respondent –DCIT, Central Circle-XVIII, Kolkata. 2 3. The CIT(A), Kolkata 4. CIT , Kolkata. 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata