SENTHILKUMAR VELUSAMY,COIMBATORE vs. NON CORPORATE 4(1), COIMBATORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering the ex-parte nature of the lower authorities' orders and the principles of natural justice, decided to provide the assessee with another opportunity. The impugned orders were set aside for a de-novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2010-11 arose from an ex-parte assessment order passed by the AO under section 144 r.w.s 147. The assessee had not filed a return of income and did not appear before the CIT(A) despite opportunities.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte assessment order should be set aside to provide the assessee with an opportunity to be heard, especially when the assessee has not filed a return of income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI & SHRI JAGADISH
The Ld. AR, at the outset, submitted that the assessment order was passed by lower authorities is ex-parte order. Accordingly, Ld. AR sought remand back of impugned matter to the Ld. AO so that the assessee could substantiate his claim before the Ld. AO.
The Ld. Sr. DR submitted that the assessee remained negligent in attending any of the proceedings.
We have heard the rival submissions, and perused the materials available on record. The Bench has observed that assesse has not filled return of income and order u/s 144 was passed ex-parte assessing total income of Rs. 21,06,607/- on the basis of bank statement called from the bank. The Assessee did not appear before the ld CIT(A), despite being given sufficient opportunities. However, the Bench accepts the submission of Ld. AR by observing that after all the orders of the lower authorities are ex-parte orders and keeping in mind the principles of natural justice, the assessee be provided with another opportunity of hearing. Therefore, the impugned orders are set-aside for de-novo assessment to the AO. The assessee shall appear before the Assessing Officer and furnish complete details for his fresh consideration subject to the condition of payment of Rs.5,000/- towards cost in favour of the State Legal Aid Authority at ITA No.857/Chny/2024 :- 3 -:
Hon’ble Madras High Court within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 22nd May, 2024.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026