Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘ B’ (SMC
Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE
आदेश / O R D E R
I found that the appeal was earlier posted for hearing on 13.10.2016 and at the request of the ld. Authorised Representative for the assessee, the case was adjourned to 09.01.2017 i.e. to-day.
When this appeal was called up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any adjournment request was received. In the ITA No. 197/Mds/2016. :- 2 -: circumstances, I am of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the case. Following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CIT v. Multiplan (India) Ltd. (38 ITD 320) (Del), I dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee, for non-prosecution.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed.
Order pronounced on Monday, the 9th January, 2017, at Chennai.