Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘ C’ BENCH : CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE & SHRI G. PAVAN KUMAR
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
When this appeal was called up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of assessee. We find that a notice dated 13.12.2016 was served on the assessee on 14.12.2016 as it is evident from the postal
ITA No. 3046/Mds/2016 :- 2 -: acknowledgement placed on record. Hence, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CIT v. Multiplan (India) Ltd. (38 ITD 320) (Del), we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee, for non-prosecution.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on Tuesday, the 17th January, 2017, at Chennai.