Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015 PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
I.T.A. NO. 780 OF 2009
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE – 1(3), C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND
M/S WIPRO GE MEDICAL SYSTEM LTD., PLOT NO.4, KADUGODI PLANTATION, INDUSTRIAL AREA, SADARAMANGALA, BANGALORE ... RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)
- 2 - THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT BANGALORE IN ITA NO.1033/ BNG/2008,DATED 10.07.2009, CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 1(3), BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. K. V. Aravind, learned counsel for the appellants and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the appellants does not dispute that the questions involved in this appeal have been decided by this court in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue in ITA No. 779/2009 decided on 9/3/2015, which was in the case of the very same assessee who is respondent in this appeal.
Accordingly, for the reasons given in the judgment and order dated 9/3/2015 passed in ITA No. 779/2009, the questions of law raised in this appeal are
- 3 - decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
Rd/-