THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted permission to the appellants to withdraw their appeal. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) and Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the ITAT. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the appeal filed by the revenue against the ITAT's order. However, the appeal was withdrawn by the appellants before any substantial legal questions were addressed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2016
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.SREENIVASE GOWDA ITA NO.611/2015 BETWEEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032
2.THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX (TDS) CIRCLE-16(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032
... APPELLANTS (BY SMT.PREETHI J.D., ADVOCATE FOR SRI K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
2 AND
THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BRANCH, BANGALORE PAN:BLRTO 3262A
... RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:08/05/2015 PASSED IN C.O.NO. 64/BANG/2014 IN ITA NO.1403/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 PRAYING TO I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN C.O.NO. 64/BANG/2014 IN ITA NO.1403/BANG/2014 DATED:08/05/2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), CIRCLE-16(2), BENGALURU.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JAYANT PATEL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned Counsel for the appellants has tendered the memo of withdrawal. 2. Permission granted. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
JT/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026