PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 vs. M/S TELELOGIC INDIA PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the question raised in these appeals had already been answered against the Revenue by a previous judgment of the same court. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had passed orders in favor of the assessees for multiple assessment years. The Revenue appealed these orders before the High Court.
What were the issues?
Whether the High Court should entertain appeals against ITAT orders when the legal issue has been settled by a prior judgment of the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.818 citing349 ITR 98 · 2012 · HC
ITA No.512/2016 C/W ITA NOs.214/2017, 217/2017 & 230/2017
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.512/2016 C/W INCOME TAX APPEAL NOs. 214/2017, 217/2017 & 230/2017
ITA NO.512/2016: BETWEEN :
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4
BMTC COMPLEX, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE
DY.COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 12(1)
BANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SANMATHI E.I, ADVOCATE)
AND :
M/S MC CREADE SOFTWARE (ASIA) PVT.LTD. NO.811, 23RD MAIN, 12TH ‘A’ CROSS 2ND PHASE, J.P.NAGAR BENGALURU – 560 078
...RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE
ITA No.512/2016 C/W ITA NOs.214/2017, 217/2017 & 230/2017
-2-
ORDER DATED 08.03.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE BENCH ‘A’ IN IT(TP)A.NO.392/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009.
ITA NO.214/2017: BETWEEN :
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6
BMTC COMPLEX, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
WARD-12(2), 4TH FLOOR
RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE – 560 001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SANMATHI E.I, ADVOCATE)
AND :
M/S SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. RMZ-ECOSPACE, 4TH FLOOR, BLOCK 3B SARJAPUR OUTER RING ROAD DEVARADISANAHALLI, VARTHUR ROAD BANGALORE – 560 037
...RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 26.10.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT ‘B’ BENCH, BENGALURU IN IT(TP)A.NO.177/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010.
ITA NO.217/2017: BETWEEN :
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5
BMTC COMPLEX, KORMANGALA, BANGALORE
DY.COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 12(1)
BANGALORE
...APPELLANTS (BY SRI SANMATHI E.I, ADVOCATE)
ITA No.512/2016 C/W ITA NOs.214/2017, 217/2017 & 230/2017
-3-
AND :
M/S NORTHERN OPERATING SERVICES PVT. LTD. 2ND FLOOR, RMZ ECO SPACE CAMPUS I C, SARJAPUR OUTER RING ROAD BELLANDUR VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE – 560 013
...RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.09.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT ‘A’ BENCH, BENGALURU IN IT(TP)A.NO.112/BANG/2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011.
ITA NO.230/2017: BETWEEN :
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7
BMTC COMPLEX, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 12(4)
BANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SANMATHI E.I, ADVOCATE)
AND :
M/S TELELOGIC INDIA PVT. LTD. C/O IBM INDIA PVT. LTD. 3RD FLOOR, SUBRAMANYA ARCADE NO.12, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD BANGALORE
...RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 10.06.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT ‘B’ BENCH,
ITA No.512/2016 C/W ITA NOs.214/2017, 217/2017 & 230/2017
-4-
BENGALURU IN MP NO.46/BANG/2016 IN IT(TP)A NO.1599/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009.
THESE INCOME TAX APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Ag.CJ (Oral):
Learned Counsel appearing for the appellants fairly submits that the question raised in these appeals is answered against the appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. [(2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)]. The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
Appeals dismissed.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026