MAGRATH PROPERTIES P LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
What did the High Court hold?
The appellant's counsel filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeals. The Court took the memo on record and accordingly dismissed the appeals as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Magrath Properties P. Ltd., filed Income Tax Appeals before the High Court of Karnataka. The appeals were filed against orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the appellant's request to withdraw the filed Income Tax Appeals before the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2018
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
I.T.A.Nos.763/2017 & 764/2017 c/w I.T.A.Nos.766-767/2017
In ITA Nos.763 & 764/2017 BETWEEN:
MAGRATH PROPERTIES P. LTD., 1ST FLOOR, EMBASSY POINT 150 INFANTRY ROAD BENGALURU – 560 005 REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.PEEYUSH MAKHIJA
…APPELLANT (BY MR.SURYANARAYANA T., ADV.)
AND:
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(2)
[ERSTWHILE ASSISTANT
COMMISSINER OF
INCOME-TAX-CIRCLE 12(1)]
BMTC BUILDING
80FT ROAD
Date of Judgment 03 -07-2018 I.T.A.Nos.763 & 764/2017 c/w ITA Nos.766-767/2017 Magrath Properties P. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax and another.
2/4
KORAMANGALA
BANGALORE – 560 096.
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX
BMTC BUILDING
KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK
BNAGALORE – 560 095.
…RESPONDENTS *****
THESE INCOME TAX APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 06.01.2017 PASSED IN ITA NOS.226 & 227/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 & ITA NO.1166/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO: (A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE (B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 06.01.2017 PASSED IN ITA NOS.226, 227 AND 1166/BANG/2014 (ANNEXURE-K), TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN AND (C) PASS SUCH OTHER OR SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO PASS ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
ITA NOS.766-767/2017:
BETWEEN
MAGRATH PROPERTIES P. LTD., 1ST FLOOR, EMBASSY POINT 150 INFANTRY ROAD BENGALURU – 560 005 REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.PEEYUSH MAKHIJA ..APPELLANT (BY SRI.SURYANARAYANA T., ADV.)
Date of Judgment 03 -07-2018 I.T.A.Nos.763 & 764/2017 c/w ITA Nos.766-767/2017 Magrath Properties P. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax and another.
3/4
AND
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(2)
[ERSTWHILE ASSISTANT
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX- CIRCLE 12(1)] BMTC BUILDING 80FT ROAD KORAMANGALA BANGALORE – 560 095.
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME-TAX
BMTC BUILDING
KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK
BANGALORE – 560 095. …RESPONDENTS ***** THESE INCOME TAX APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 24.05.2017 PASSED IN MP NOS.80 & 81/BANG/2017 IN ITA NO.226 AND 1166/BANG/2014 (ANNEXURE-L) FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 & 2010- 11, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO: (A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE (B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 24.05.2017 PASSED IN MP NOS.80 & 81/BANG/2017 IN ITA NOS.226 AND 1166/BANG/2014 (ANNEXURE-L), TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN AND (C) PASS SUCH OTHER OR SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO PASS ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THESE I.T.As. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY Dr. VINEET KOTHARI J. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
Date of Judgment 03 -07-2018 I.T.A.Nos.763 & 764/2017 c/w ITA Nos.766-767/2017 Magrath Properties P. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax and another.
4/4
JUDGMENT
Mr.Suryanarayana T. Adv. for Appellant
Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the present appeals.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn.
A copy of the order be sent to the Revenue.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026