SOCIETE GENERAL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS CENTER PVT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
What did the High Court hold?
The assessee's counsel filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. The revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Societe General Global Solutions Center Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the ITAT. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's decision to withdraw the appeal filed against the ITAT's order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2018 PRESENT THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA ITA No.437/2016 Between:
Societe General Global Solutions Center Pvt. Ltd., `Inventor’ Bldg., 6th Floor, International Tech Park Whitefield Road Bengaluru-560 006, Represented herein by its Financial Controller and Company Secretary, Mr.Madurai Murugan.
.. Appellant
(By Sri. Sandeep Huilgol, Advocate for Sri T.Suryanarayana, Advocate )
And:
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(2)(2), (Erstwhile Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-12(3) BMTC Building, 80 Feet Road, Koramangala, Bengaluru – 560 095.
The Commissioner of Income Tax BMTC Building, 80 Feet Road, Koramangala Bengaluru-560 001.
.. Respondents
( By Sri E.I.Sanmathi, Advocate )
Date of Judgment:26.07.2018 in ITA No.437/2016 Societe General Global Solutions Center Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
2/2
This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, praying to formulate the substantial questions of law and to allow the appeal and set aside the order of the ITAT, `A’ Bench, Bengaluru, pronounced on 22.4.2016 in IT (TP) A No.1188/Bang/2011 (Annexure-G) to the extent questioned herein.
This ITA coming on for Hearing this day, Dr.Vineet Kothari, J., delivered the following: JUDGMENT
Mr.Sandeep Huilgol, Adv. for Mr.T.Suryanarayana, Adv, for Appellant-Assessee. Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, Adv. for Respondents-Revenue.
The learned counsel for the appellant-Assessee has filed a memo dated 26.07.2018, seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
The learned counsel for the Revenue has no objection.
Recording the memo, The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
bk/ (List No.2 Sl.No.9)
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Himansu Palei vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST CBIC Keonjhar Division, KeonjharOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Access Worldwide Cargo vs. The Commissioner Of CustomsKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- Sri Bharath Reddy vs. M/S Nagarjuna Group Of RestaurantsKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Greenlam Industries LTD And Another vs. The UOI And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026