INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-62(1), DELHI, CIVIC CENTRE, DELHI vs. SHREE DIAMONDS, DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the enhanced limit for filing departmental appeals as per CBDT Circular 09/2024. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed due to low tax effect, and the assessee's cross-objections were dismissed as infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objections arise from an order of the CIT(A)/NFAC concerning assessment year 2013-14, involving proceedings under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act. The tax effect in the Revenue's appeal was found to be Rs. 7,02,858/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed on grounds of low tax effect as per the prevailing CBDT circular. The validity and outcome of the assessee's cross-objections.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
O R D E R PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM: This Revenue’s appeal and assessee’s cross-objections ITA no.
6747/Del/2025 & CO No. 254/Del/2025, for assessment year 2013-14, arise against the CIT(A)/ NFAC, Delhi’s order dated 28.08.2025 (DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1080120487(1), in proceedings u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’.
It transpires during the course of hearing that the tax effect involved in the instant Revenue’s appeal is 7,02,858/- i.e. less than that of Rs. sixty lakhs as per lakhs for filing departmental appeals before the tribunal.. This Revenue’s appeal is hereby dismissed involving low tax effect in very terms thereore subject to all just exceptions.
The assessee’s cross objections C.O. No. 254/Del/2025 is hereby dismissed as infructuous. objections CO No. 254/Del/2025 are dismissed in above terms. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files.
Order pronounced in open court on 27.11.2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026