M/S MERCEDES BENZ RESEARCH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. This decision was based on a memo filed by the appellant in the court on the day of the hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Mercedes Benz Research and Development India Private Limited, filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka. This appeal arose from an order passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Year 2008-2009.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the selection of the most appropriate method for transfer pricing. However, the appeal was withdrawn before this could be adjudicated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.403 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
M/S MERCEDES BENZ RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (A PRIVATE COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956) HAVING ITS OFFICES AT: WHITEFIELD PALMS PLOT NO.9 AND 10 EPIP ZONE, PHASE 1 WHITEFIELD ROAD BENGALURU-560066
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI:K.MALLAHA RAO AND SRI:NAGESHWAR RAO, ADVOCATES)
2 AND:
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12(1) BENGALURU
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI:K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 16.03.2016 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.1336/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008- 2009 ANNEXURE-A PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO (1) ADMIT THE INSTANT APPEAL TO ANSWER THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW SET OUT IN PARA 23 ABOVE; (2) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE 'A' PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL TO THE EXTENT IT REJECTS APPELLANT'S GROUNDS RELATING TO SELECTION OF MOST APPROPRIATE METHOD IN IT(TP)A NO.1336/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 ANNEXURE-A AS FILED BY THE APPELLANT ASSESSEE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AND (3) PASS SUCH FURTHER AND OTHER ORDERS IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
*****
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3 JUDGMENT
In view of the memo filed in the Court today, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/-
SD/- JUDGE
JUDGE
*bgn/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026