TEXAS INSTRUMENTS (INDIA) PVT LTD vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTU

PDF · subscribers
ITA/793/2017HC KarnatakaKAHC01051181201702 February 2021Bench: ALOK ARADHE,R. NATARAJ3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The assessee's counsel filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal. The court took the memo on record and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Texas Instruments (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee. The court's decision was based on this withdrawal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY I.T.A. NO.793 OF 2017 BETWEEN: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., BAGMANE TECH PARK, NO.66/3 ADJACENT TO LRDE, BYRASANDRA CV RAMAN NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560093 REP. HEREIN BY ITS TAX MANAGER MS. PALLAVI PAI. .... APPELLANT (BY MS. MAHIM GOUD, ADV., FOR MR. SURYANARAYANA T, ADV.,) AND: 1. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF

INCOME-TAX - LTU

[PRESENTLY JOINT COMMISSIONER

OF INCOME-TAX - LTU]

JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD

BANASHANKARI III STAGE

BANGALORE-560085. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-LTU

JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD

BANASHANKARI III STAGE

BANGALORE-560085. ... RESPONDENTS (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 16.06.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1032/BANG/2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007- 08, PRAYING TO: (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 16.06.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1032/BANG/2011, TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN (ANNEXURE-H). AND PASS SUCH OTHER OR SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIR TO PASS ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Smt.Mahima Goud, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record.

3 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE RV

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →