TEXAS INSTRUMENTS (INDIA) PVT LTD vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTU
What did the High Court hold?
The assessee's counsel filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal. The court took the memo on record and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Texas Instruments (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee. The court's decision was based on this withdrawal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY I.T.A. NO.793 OF 2017 BETWEEN: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., BAGMANE TECH PARK, NO.66/3 ADJACENT TO LRDE, BYRASANDRA CV RAMAN NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560093 REP. HEREIN BY ITS TAX MANAGER MS. PALLAVI PAI. .... APPELLANT (BY MS. MAHIM GOUD, ADV., FOR MR. SURYANARAYANA T, ADV.,) AND: 1. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX - LTU
[PRESENTLY JOINT COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME-TAX - LTU]
JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD
BANASHANKARI III STAGE
BANGALORE-560085. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-LTU
JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD
BANASHANKARI III STAGE
BANGALORE-560085. ... RESPONDENTS (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 16.06.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1032/BANG/2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007- 08, PRAYING TO: (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 16.06.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1032/BANG/2011, TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN (ANNEXURE-H). AND PASS SUCH OTHER OR SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIR TO PASS ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Smt.Mahima Goud, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
3 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE RV
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026