SRI NAVAL KUMAR CHHABRA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
What did the High Court hold?
The assessee's counsel filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the ITAT. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act for block assessment years 1988-89 to 1998-99.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee. The court considered the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY I.T.A. NO.625 OF 2016 BETWEEN: SRI. NAVAL KUMAR CHHABRA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS SON OF LATE SATYAPAL CHHABRA 162, "SOBHA IVORY" ST. JOHN'S ROAD BANGALORE-560042. .... APPELLANT (BY MR. JINITA CHATTERJEE, ADV., FOR MR. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.,) AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE-560001 PRESENTLY INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD-1(2)(3), BMTC BUILDING KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560095. ... RESPONDENT (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 25.07.2016 PASSED IN IT(SS)A NO.15/BANG/2012 & CROSS OBJECTION NO.7/BANG/2012 (IN I.T.(SS)A NO.15/BANG/2012) FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1988-89 TO 1998-99, PRAYING TO: (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE.
2 (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE ITAT DATED 25.07.2016 BEARING IT(SS)A No.15/BANG/2012 & CROSS OBJECTION NO.7/BANG/2012 (IN IT(SS)A No.15/BANG/2012) FOR THE BLOCK ASSESSMENT YEARS 1988-89 TO 1998-99. PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Smt.R.Prathiba, learned counsel for the assessee has entered appearance through video conferencing. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE RV
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026