No AI summary yet for this case.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY I.T.A. NO.769 OF 2017 BETWEEN: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS (INDIA) PVT., LTD., NO.66/3, BAGAMANE TECHNOLOGIES PARK ADJACENT TO LRDE BYRASANDRA, C.V. RAMAN NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560093. REP. BY MR. ITS FINANCE DIRECTOR MR. SHETUL THAKRAR PAN: No.AAACT 5445M. .... APPELLANT (BY MS. MAHIMA GOUD, ADV., FOR MR. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.,) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX - LTU.
[PRESENTLY JOINT COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX - LTU
JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD
BANASHANKARI III STAGE
BANGALORE-560085. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
LTU, JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD
BANASHANKARI III STAGE
BANGALORE-560085. ... RESPONDENTS (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 19.05.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1478/BANG/2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006- 07, PRAYING TO: (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 19.05.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1478/BANG/2010 TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN (ANNEXURE-H). (iii) PASS SUCH OTHER OR SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO PASS ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Smt.Mahima Goud, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
3 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE RV