THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs M/S DSL SOFTWARE LTD

-1— IN ThE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED ThIS ThE 29Th DAY OF MAY 2012 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR AND THE HOWBLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREEN1VASE GOWDA Income Tar Appeal Na926/2006 BETWEEN: 1. The Commissioner of Income-Tax Central Circle, C.RBuildlng. Queens Road, Bangalore. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle-i 1(2), C.RBuildlng, Queens Road. Bangalore. .. APPELLANTS (By Sri.K.V.Aravlnd. Adv.) AND: MIs DSL Software Ltd.. (Formerly Deutsche Software Ltd..) S’fl’ Unit-I. The Leela Gallerla No.23. Airport Road Bangalore - 560 009. .. RESPONDENT (By Sri M.Lava, Adv., for Sri.A.Shankar & M.Lava, Advs.) This i.T.A. is flied under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act. 1961. praying to allow the appeal and set aside the

2 vrdel% p %‘d b 1 i- Inconw i’x ppe1kdc Tribunal. Is tna1’ :e In N :44; t4an&,r2UO4 ‘hUed 29 12 2t)t5 11 1 i.e a it a tirn he c r p ‘d t_ hr sjst (nii lIc%lc of Lflt;’lii’ iii. ‘. i.• 11(21. flani.ii. •‘iiil t.ii I ‘a nfl or nr I’ d” SRL’WRA KUM4R J-. ci C w f wi’ JUDGMEN7 Ibis appeal by i lie revenue 1% diieetc d aaIn%t IliC c der ci the I wcur 1a ppel i.e 1’ unal Ban alore Wit ore sec A Io.34i /I3 1 uig/2004 1 di (U Li lii 11’; iulit”iIlI’t ,iLt,,tdtITIa Ut—%LIC:ll tj 1 c’S ljt ‘IW 11 tf lTj ‘ 1. Ii’ ii c ne h ic 1’ iii 11 .“ ‘c’ ‘icas— :a 4 fl.. risk ‘ ‘‘ ( J K ‘l’ 1) F 1” If t ‘111 a iij# SE ‘I IL , “ -.•‘.,.. —,

MI. A. Shuiktu ar-I ‘U. l_avL take nodet 1(1 ‘PI)C’L thi rh t’s•c’ 3 t’%J)fJtftI(,t 4 Mr LaSH. waflttd fl)ifl’$ PI’ iU1i1I4 mr ;hc a%sets 1t ponti it subrint S t Itat Lift it’ 1011 P’ ‘st-cl 5 i rnr an’wer p this app.-.’l at the instance il ‘lie teit ni s o - b_’ ru jidcjmc it o tu iI)tibl S petit ( t 1 t C (SC c OMMI &O’UR 0 INCMETAX.TL6Y4YNE ‘ID (20 1)3 0 TR 2’6 1 va, id1irea-idi t s fl%’ita itt’s lit’ JS1JU i’d 11 ii ‘ a IS ‘‘0 t” ol ht ‘ d%C the mitler • ‘Vt ‘ti . t 1 iv j :‘lce’r itT t ii”— ‘. - : t:’&fj j I , t 1 C It 1 (-OMMIS ‘lONER 0 INC OWE I IS Vs TULSYSNflGLID (2011)3 0 1R 2

-4- Four weeks time granted to Advocates, who have appeared for respondent - assessee to file power. Sd!- JUDGE Sd/ JUDGE Mfla

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S DSL SOFTWARE LTD