PURUSHOTAM AGARWAL,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against the order of the CIT(A). The assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The reason for withdrawal was that the matter had been settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal could be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement under a specific scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA & SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD
सुनवाईक�तारीख/ Date of hearing: 20.01.2022 20.01.2022 उ�ोषणाक�तारीख/Pronouncement on आदेश /O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.
This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-2, Noida dated 14.11.2017 for AY 2008-09.
Ld. Counsel for assessee seeks permission to withdraw the appeal as the matter in issue has been settled in Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and form no. 3 has already been issued.
I.T.A.No.277/Del/2018
In view of the above, appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 20/01/2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026