C.J. MANGALIWALA DHARMARTH TRUST,HISAR vs. CIT,(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reasons cited by the CIT(E) for rejection were matters of assessment and not relevant for the grant of registration. Since the assessee was already registered under Section 12AA, and the department had previously examined the genuineness of its activities, these issues should be dealt with during assessment proceedings.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a public charitable trust, applied for renewal of registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application, citing surplus income, nominal expenditure towards charity, sale of land with profit, cash deposits, and an advanced loan as reasons to doubt the genuineness of the trust's activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for renewal of registration under Section 12AB based on issues that are primarily assessment-related.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW DELHI
O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.: The appeal in arises out of the order of the ld 1. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(E)’, in short] dated 21.03.2024 against the revenue of registration of trust u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). At the outset, we find that there is delay in filing of appeal by 313 2. days before us. Considering the reasons adduced in the delay condonation petition, in the interest of substantial justice, we are inclined to condone the delay and admit the appeal of the assessee for adjudication. The only issue to be decided in this appeal as to whether ld CIT(E), 3. Chandigarh was justified in rejecting the application for renewal of registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. Page | 1 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material 4. available on record. The assessee is a public charitable trust which was established in February 2005. The trust had made an application for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act on 28.09.2016 and granted registration thereon on 28.09.2016. The CIT(E) noticed on perusal of the financial statement of the assessee for FYs 2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23 that main source of the income of the assessee society is agricultural income, Dharamsala receipts, interest income from bank and rent. It was submitted that the assessee owns a building which has 10 shops which are let out to tenants. The building also has six rooms and two halls. The building is used as Dharamshala. The receipts from charity were deployed towards the objects of the assessee society. On perusal of the objects of the assessee society which are reproduced at page 6 and 7 of the order of the ld CIT(E) in Form 10AD Annexure therein, we find that the objects stated thereon are purely charitable in nature. The total receipts and total expenditure of the society together with the surplus for the last three years are tabulated below:– Assessment Total Total Surplus Year Receipts Expenditure 2022-23 Rs.8,73,589/- Rs.3,10,034/- Rs.5,63,555/- 2021-22 Rs.9,60,522/- Rs.5,06,652/- Rs.4,53,870/- 2020-21 Rs.6,29,617/- Rs.5,38,855/- Rs.90,762/- The ld CIT(E) had noted that the assessee have been deriving surplus 5. year on year and the amount expended towards charity is nominal. Ld CIT(E) also noted that the assessee had sold some of the land and had made profit thereon. Further, the assessee had made some cash deposit on 08.04.2021, 21.04.2021, 31.05.2021, which cannot be directly linked with the income disclosed in the income and expenditure account. Further it was noticed by the ld CIT(E) that assessee had advanced loan of ₹21 lakhs to Shri Rani Sati Dadi (Mangaliwala Trust) in the year 2021. Based on these facts, ld CIT(E) concluded that activities of the assessee society are not genuine and not in consonance with the main objectives of the society. Further, ld CIT(E) also observed that assessee had debited certain expenditure in its income expenditure account and which could not be substantiated by the assessee. Based on this fact, ld CIT(E) rejected the application seeking registration u/s 12AB of the Act. In our considered opinion, the reason adduced by the ld CIT(E) for 6. rejection of registration are purely the matter of assessment and not relevant to be looked into at the time of grant of registration u/s 12AB of the Act. It is pertinent to note that the assessee is already registered u/s 12AA of the Act from 28.09.2016 onwards. Pursuant to the change in the Act, the assessee had applied for seeking permanent registration u/s 12AB of the Act. The department had already examined the genuineness of the charitable activities of the assessee society while originally granting registration u/s 12AA of the Act. All the factors considered by the ld CIT(E) as stated supra are subject matter of assessment and the same could be looked into in detail at the time of assessment proceedings and the same shall not stand as hindrance while granting registration u/s 12AB of the Act. Hence, we direct the ld CIT(E) to grant registration to the assessee society. Accordingly, the ground raised by the assessee is allowed. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
7. Order pronounced in the open court on 10/12/2025.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026